Knew this day was not far..
This is breaking news... and will be evaluated... evaluated... and re-evaluated over the next few days and months, but a NASA scientist, Dr. Richard B. Hoover claims that he has found conclusive evidence of alien life — fossils of bacteria found in an extremely rare class of meteorite. That's an awesome claim.
Below are two pics of the fossils of the bacteria found in the meteorite.
Dr Hoover says "The exciting thing is that they are in many cases recognizable and can be associated very closely with the generic species here on earth"... which is cool! He further says "There are some that are just very strange and don’t look like anything that I’ve been able to identify, and I’ve shown them to many other experts that have also come up stump."
However, given the controversial nature of this claim, his paper will be examined by hundreds of experts all over the world over the next few days. If this discovery turns out to be true, the implications for human life will be staggering.
Here we come aliens...Oops! too early for that.
Images Courtesy: news.yahoo.com
A Quote by Sir Martin Rees, Astronomer Royal of Great Britain
Telescopes are in some ways like time machines...
They reveal galaxies so far away that their light has taken billions of years to reach us. We in astronomy have an advantage in studying the universe, in that we can actually see the past. We owe our existence to stars, because they make the atoms of which we are formed. So if you are romantic you can say we are literally starstuff. If you're less romantic you can say we're the nuclear waste from the fuel that makes stars shine. We've made so many advances in our understanding. A few centuries ago, the pioneer navigators learnt the size and shape of our Earth, and the layout of the continents. We are now just learning the dimensions and ingredients of our entire cosmoc, and can at last make some sense of our cosmic habitat.
Latest in Space - Top Stories
Monday, March 7, 2011
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Apophis, the Planet Killer to Hit Earth in 2036???
Apophis, derived its name from an Egyptian myth, meaning... A demon serpant of darkness.

Here we go again! It was in 2004 when NASA scared the heck out of people and this time its the Russians. Dont take me wrong... All due respect to both the organizations for keeping track of such objects well in advance.
Here is the thing, there is 1 in 250,000 chances that the "Planet Killer" will hit Earth. Its comforting to know however, that in one of the International NEO (Near Earth Objects)meetings in 2005, it was decided that more research needs to be done on how to avoid that "1" chance of impact. Since then there have been numerous ideas on how to avaid that impact.

Here we go again! It was in 2004 when NASA scared the heck out of people and this time its the Russians. Dont take me wrong... All due respect to both the organizations for keeping track of such objects well in advance.
Here is the thing, there is 1 in 250,000 chances that the "Planet Killer" will hit Earth. Its comforting to know however, that in one of the International NEO (Near Earth Objects)meetings in 2005, it was decided that more research needs to be done on how to avoid that "1" chance of impact. Since then there have been numerous ideas on how to avaid that impact.
Just to give you an idea of how large this asteroide is...it is larger than two football fields and cause more damage that 1000 Hiroshimas blown at once!
The asteroid will come really close to the Earth in 1929 and will cause it to change its path by an angle due to Earths gravity. It will continue to rotate around the Sun until it gets back to Earth on April 13, 1936. There is very very little or no chance that it will hit Earth in 1929 but what will happen in 1936 is still a little fuzzy. It seems we will have to wait until 2013 before we get a clearer picture of what will happen then.
There are certainly tons of reports that conflict the probability of such a doomsday event on the internet, but the question remains: How scared should we be?
Images Courtesy: nasa, jpl, msnbc, and space.com
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Astrophotography with a Dobsonian
I have been surrounded by quite a few interesting things over the last few months. Here is what I have been doing..."Researching" ... Researching on Astrophotography!
Fact: It is not possible to take GREAT pictures with a Dobsonian... Agreed!
Truth: It is possible to take reasonably good pictures with a Dobsonian.
Let me explain...
Astro enthusiasts know this already, that celestial objects are not stationary in the sky... they keep moving... well, not exactly... Earth spins and so it appears as if the celestial objects are moving. In any case it appears as if they are moving. Now, with a dobsonian, one will have to manually adjust and align the object under observation repeatedly... which could be quiet some pain(especially at 300 and above magnifications the objects under observation travel pretty fast).
Concept for equitorial mount: In order to have the object under observation at the center of the viewer... we will have to compensate for the motion of the Earth (Earth rotates from west to east... hence all objects appear to rise from the east and set in the west). Compensation would mean... if we place our telescope on a devise that rotates it in the opposite direction to that of the earth... the earths motion and the telescopes motion will cancel each other and the object of observation will remain "still" at the center of the viewer.
Method: After a lot of research, I found that the equitorial mount will be the best solution. Building this would take a little bit of engineering drawing, little electronics and carpentary. If it sounds hard... well... it is!
By the way... you must be thinking what has Astrophotography got to do with all of this.
Concept for Astrophotography: Taking pictures during night(or on low light) is tough. as the exposure that the camera gets to the light is very less. Low light photography is done using long exposure. There are ways to do this using a ccd webcam(in my case a Logitech QuickcamPro 3000... these CCD webcams are not in production anymore so I bought one on Ebay for $45). You will need to do some modification to the circuit and a little soldering to the webcam circuit board. For a long exposure shot.. the object under observation needs to be focused at the center of the viewer for a long time( 5 sec, 10 sec, 1 min... etc depending on the object). Hence the Equitorial Mount, as it will not be humanly possible to keep the object at the center of the eyepeace manually.
Now-a-days I am trying to build this total setup from various sources available on the internet. It will at-least take me a month or so to complete this whole thing. I plan to do a tutotial with pictures, for those of you who might be interested. Will update my progress on regular basis. Stay tuned and feel free to leave comments.
Clear skies!
Fact: It is not possible to take GREAT pictures with a Dobsonian... Agreed!
Truth: It is possible to take reasonably good pictures with a Dobsonian.
Let me explain...
Astro enthusiasts know this already, that celestial objects are not stationary in the sky... they keep moving... well, not exactly... Earth spins and so it appears as if the celestial objects are moving. In any case it appears as if they are moving. Now, with a dobsonian, one will have to manually adjust and align the object under observation repeatedly... which could be quiet some pain(especially at 300 and above magnifications the objects under observation travel pretty fast).
Concept for equitorial mount: In order to have the object under observation at the center of the viewer... we will have to compensate for the motion of the Earth (Earth rotates from west to east... hence all objects appear to rise from the east and set in the west). Compensation would mean... if we place our telescope on a devise that rotates it in the opposite direction to that of the earth... the earths motion and the telescopes motion will cancel each other and the object of observation will remain "still" at the center of the viewer.
Method: After a lot of research, I found that the equitorial mount will be the best solution. Building this would take a little bit of engineering drawing, little electronics and carpentary. If it sounds hard... well... it is!
By the way... you must be thinking what has Astrophotography got to do with all of this.
Concept for Astrophotography: Taking pictures during night(or on low light) is tough. as the exposure that the camera gets to the light is very less. Low light photography is done using long exposure. There are ways to do this using a ccd webcam(in my case a Logitech QuickcamPro 3000... these CCD webcams are not in production anymore so I bought one on Ebay for $45). You will need to do some modification to the circuit and a little soldering to the webcam circuit board. For a long exposure shot.. the object under observation needs to be focused at the center of the viewer for a long time( 5 sec, 10 sec, 1 min... etc depending on the object). Hence the Equitorial Mount, as it will not be humanly possible to keep the object at the center of the eyepeace manually.
Now-a-days I am trying to build this total setup from various sources available on the internet. It will at-least take me a month or so to complete this whole thing. I plan to do a tutotial with pictures, for those of you who might be interested. Will update my progress on regular basis. Stay tuned and feel free to leave comments.
Clear skies!
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Tips for looking through a telescope
Last weekend was the first time I was looking through my telescope. I had to drive 2 Hrs to get to a star party. It was fun looking at the amazing stuff people had. I looked at Jupiter(my first object through my Zhumell 10 inch) and the Orion nebule.
I knew all my theoretical stuff.. how to read a sky map? What is altitude and Azmuth? How to focus on an object and things like that... but I bet there are tons of other things that you will learn when you are actually operating the scope. Here are a few tips for people who are looking through their telescopes for the first time:
1. To start with... Always, colliminate your scope before you start. That is because when you are setting up your scope(or during logistics), chances are that the collimination is lost.
2. Find your object using the "finder scope". Next...start with the lowest magnification(say 35mm). Bring the object of observation to the center of the screen and adjuct the focus using your eyepiece. You could now, increase the magnification to the next level(say 12.5mm)... your view through the scope might not be in the center now and might be blurry. You now need to get it to the center of the screen again and focus it. You are now ready to increase it to the next magnification(say 6mm or 4mm). You need to now again bring it back to the center of the screen and re-focus it.
Note: One important thing here is to bring the image to the near perfect center of your view. Because when you go from magnification 12.5mm to 6mm or 4 mm... you are going from 96X magnification to 300X magnification. So, if the image is not in the near perfect center, you might loose the image in the 300X view.
I knew all my theoretical stuff.. how to read a sky map? What is altitude and Azmuth? How to focus on an object and things like that... but I bet there are tons of other things that you will learn when you are actually operating the scope. Here are a few tips for people who are looking through their telescopes for the first time:
1. To start with... Always, colliminate your scope before you start. That is because when you are setting up your scope(or during logistics), chances are that the collimination is lost.
2. Find your object using the "finder scope". Next...start with the lowest magnification(say 35mm). Bring the object of observation to the center of the screen and adjuct the focus using your eyepiece. You could now, increase the magnification to the next level(say 12.5mm)... your view through the scope might not be in the center now and might be blurry. You now need to get it to the center of the screen again and focus it. You are now ready to increase it to the next magnification(say 6mm or 4mm). You need to now again bring it back to the center of the screen and re-focus it.
Note: One important thing here is to bring the image to the near perfect center of your view. Because when you go from magnification 12.5mm to 6mm or 4 mm... you are going from 96X magnification to 300X magnification. So, if the image is not in the near perfect center, you might loose the image in the 300X view.
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
My gateway to the Heavens!!
Check this out guys... my first telescope. A birthday gift from one of my cousins. Its a Dobsonian 10 inch Zhumell. There is a star party on the 4th of November. Cant wait to get a view through this beauty!!
Good news - Its a 10 inch, so it has got a lot of light gathering capacity... hope to get some nice views of our moon, Jupiter, some nebula and a few galaxies.
Bad news - Its a Dobsonian... does not have an equatorial mount. Since the relative position of stars, planets and our Earth keeps changing, tracking though this telescope would be tough. Taking pictures is almost impossible.
Bottom line - Great telescope for starter amateur astronomers.
Clear Skies!
Sunday, October 3, 2010
Opportunity's latest picture of Mars
This image from the navigation camera on NASA's Mars Exploration Rover "Opportunity" shows surroundings of the rover's location following an 81-meter (266-foot) drive during the 2,363rd Martian day, or sol, of Opportunity's mission on Mars (that was as of Sept. 16, 2010). The terrain includes light-toned bedrock and darker ripples of wind-blown sand. Today it is the 2380th Martian day. By the way a Sol means Solar day.
FYI - 1 year on Mars in around 668 Sols.
Source: nasa.gov
Friday, October 1, 2010
Life on Alien Planet near Earth???
This is in continuation to my previous blog... Help yourself reading my previous blog too.
One of the planet's discoverers said in a briefing yesterday that "the chances of life on this planet(Gliese 581g) are 100 percent." How do we prove this? Scientists say there are several ways, but the best approach is as simple as "Listening for signals". This planet is 20.5 light years away from Earth, so human built probes won't be getting out there anytime soon :) By the way a light year is the distance traveled by light in 1 year.
One of the planet's discoverers said in a briefing yesterday that "the chances of life on this planet(Gliese 581g) are 100 percent." How do we prove this? Scientists say there are several ways, but the best approach is as simple as "Listening for signals". This planet is 20.5 light years away from Earth, so human built probes won't be getting out there anytime soon :) By the way a light year is the distance traveled by light in 1 year.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




